 |
|
An update on consultation and accommodation: the courts design creative remedies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 1 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Since the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its leading decisions in
Haida Nation v. British Columbia(Minister of Forests) [2004] 3 S.C.R. 511, Taku River Tlingit First Nation v. British Columbia (Project Assessment Director) [2004] 3 S.C.R. 550 and Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage) [2005] 3 S.C.R. 388, several lower courts have been required to apply the principles set forth in these decisions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|